You divide this amount each and every time by the odds so that your profits and your stakes will fluctuate always depending on the odds but the returning on each individual bet (the sum of the two, stake and profit) will be always the same, the fixed amount you considered in the first place.

Hi eug3nix,

the staking plan you are looking at is which we call: Fixed win/risk staking plan (=equal win, equal risk). You always win the same amount when backing, and risk the same amount when laying.

Here a few articles on this subject:
Choosing the Right Staking Plan
Euro 2012 Simulation – The Moment of Truth: Staking Plan Comparison

I want to discuss with you another staking plan: a fix amount divided by the odds.

Example:
Back odds 1.81 -> 20 / 1.81 = 11.05$ stake which implies possible winnings of 8.95$
Lay odds 2.16 -> 20 / 2.16 = 9.26$ to be won which implies a liability of 10.74$

On this particular betting sequence presented by you it yields less than the standard staking plan (uniform liability) due to the large variation of the odds selected but I think it performs slightly better in general. Anyways, I would like to hear your opinion on it.

The big question is how do you come up with your probabilities?
Otherwise this approach is valid for identifying value.

Thanks for you comment but I’m slightly confused as I don’t see the relevance for staking?

I have different staking plan. I multiply propabilities (in my opinion) and odd and it must be over 1 (usually from 1 to 1,2).

Example:

6/10*1,8=1,08

When i bet lay i just simple reverse odds like it would be back bet.
I think it’s very popular and common staking method. What do you think about it?